![]() ![]() ![]() Package openjdk-7-jre-headless:amd64 is not configured yet. Java SE 11 / OpenJDK 11 ( The most important new features in Java 11). When I try to, I get the following error: No apport report written because the error message indicates its a followup error from a previous failure.ĭpkg: error processing package openjdk-7-jre-headless:amd64 (-configure):Ĭannot compute MD5 hash for file '/etc/java-7-openjdk/logging.properties': failed to read (Input/output error)ĭpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of default-jre-headless:ĭefault-jre-headless depends on openjdk-7-jre-headless (>= 7~u3-2.1.1) however: Installed to C:jdk1.2.2 and C:Program Files (x86)JavaSoftJRE1.2 by. Note: You cant stop it from the same command line using Ctrl+C. ![]() ( actualize JDK VERSION, URL and HASH value): # First stage: JDK 11 with modules required for Spring BootĮNV JDK_URL="$ -o /tmp/ have become unable to install anything on my Ubuntu 14.04 box. Then, run it from the command line using: docker run -p 8080:8080 dockermyapp. So, final Dockerfile looks smth like this copy compiled minimal Java distribution from stage 1 to the new image.compile Java minimal distribution for your project (aka JRE) using jlink tool.download and install Oracle OpenJDK archive on the first Docker build stage.use debian:stretch-slim (latest stable) base image.Jedi path if we want to use official Oracle OpenJDK distribution on stable slim Linux version ( Debian 9 "Stretch" for now): Taking as an example of simple spring boot application (with only one REST endpoint) so far i was able to figure out the following solutions (considering application jar is located at build/libs/spring-boot-demo.jar before Docker build: What are optimized or recommended ways to build and deliver Java 11 applications as docker images? Expected it to be much smaller.Īs a result of these issues even slim Oracle Java 11 base images are quite heavy and considered to be unstable: When I did install java by using the following command: sudo apt install openjdk-11-jre-headless Its in my path as I can. jlink runtime image size (specifically libjvm.so) created from openjdk is huge. I am trying to run a java application, but its saying javac not found. ![]() In the same time current stable Debian versions still doesn't have Java 11 packages ( Ubuntu has Java 10 installed under openjdk-11 packages), that's why unstable sid versions are used for base docker imagesĬurrently available Oracle openjdk-11 images build unstripped libjvm.so module, which has hundreds megabyte and must be stripped separately:.Oracle OpenJDK 11 doesn't support Linux Alpine, so lightweight images can't be easily created JRE is not distributed as a separate "package". You can find the following Versions: Version (Ex. This version is not open-source and we recommend that it only be used if OpenJDK is not sufficient. Oracle also provides the latest OpenJDK release under the open source GPL License at. This version is preferred, and included in Fedora. Inspired by question Why is the Java 11 base Docker image so large? (openjdk:11-jre-slim) I found that this topic in Java world is still not settled.Īs for there are common issues/pitfalls (discussed in the ticket above): OpenJDK an open-source implementation of the Java Platform, Standard Edition. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |